‘Big Tech’ dominance puts index on shifting sands

‘Big Tech’ dominance puts index on shifting sands

The changing nature of an index driven by the rise of technology firms, which typically pay low or no dividends, has led to a large structural bias against income investors. So how do they prosper in such an environment?

Technological disruption has not only affected individual sectors, but the global equity index1 as a whole. However, looking purely at the Information Technology (IT) sector is misleading: MSCI changed the industry classifications at the end of September 2018, creating a Communications Services sector which integrated telecommunications, media and internet companies. This was ostensibly to reflect the evolution in the way people communicate and access entertainment content, but it also saw companies such as Alphabet, Facebook, Alibaba and Baidu shift out of the IT sector.

Figure 1: Big five US tech firms – weighting in index
A graph showing Big five US tech firms – weighting in index
Source: Columbia Threadneedle Investments and FactSet

This allowed investors to own more of the “Big Tech”2 firms without breaching allocation limits to a single sector. It also likely helped accelerate the increase in the index weighting of Big Tech (Figure 1), which has gone from less than 5% of the index at the back end of 2014 to more than 10% at the end of 2019. While the US’s representation in the index has also climbed a few percentage points to 56%, the proportion of the big five US tech firmswithin this has gone from 8% to 16% 4. Typically, these companies pay low or no dividend payments, preferring to focus on acquiring market share, other companies or their own shares.

Figure 2: Big five US tech firms – weighting in index
A percent bar graph showing Big five US tech firms – weighting in index
Source: Columbia Threadneedle Investments and FactSet

What is an income investor to do?

The rise of Big Tech and the US outperformance more generally has led to an increasingly large structural bias versus the index against income investors who avoid stocks offering low or minimal dividends. Our approach, however, favours focusing on highly free cash flow-generative companies that are allocating capital optimally. We like companies that are delivering top-line growth while making sizeable capital returns to shareholders, as we believe this promotes efficient use of capital and prioritisation of investment.

Historically we have had a singular focus on dividends, but this has led to an increasing proportion of our risk budget being driven by what we can’t own due to the shifting sands of the index. Consequently, we think focusing on shareholder yield, which incorporates share buybacks as well as dividends, improves the opportunity set in terms of sector and regional breakdown, and allows us to reduce the structural risks that have arisen over time and accelerated in 2019.

Therefore, rather than only investing in companies with a dividend yield above that of the index, we shall now target those with both a dividend yield of more than 1% – we are an income fund after all! – and a shareholder yield greater than the dividend yield on the index. In other words, we are looking for the same level of capital return from the companies in which we invest but acknowledge the different means through which this can be done.

Figure 3: A more balanced opportunity set
A table showing regional and sector breakdown by weight
Source: Columbia Threadneedle Investments and FactSet

Figure 3 demonstrates the impact. The opportunity set now more closely resembles our index, with the 12.2% underweight to North America dropping to just 1.8% and the IT exposure comparable to that of the index. At a stock level, that’s a 30% increase in North American names to 331 against an index of 709. Further, it boosts the number of names available in the IT sector by around 50% to 108, while Healthcare increases by more than 40% to 48.

What outcome does this have for portfolios?

Our underlying philosophy is unchanged. We focus on consistent and wise capital allocation; this remains the case, but we will now be incorporating regular share repurchases into our capital return metrics. We will still seek high dividend yields and will not be buying zero or minimal dividend yield stocks. The rest is unchanged in terms of growth and sustainability of capital return, but we have the flexibility to mitigate the structural risks that have built over time and accelerated in 2019.

We recognise the index has shifted over time and believe that focusing on shareholder yield, which incorporates share repurchases as well as dividends, enables income investors to better build a balanced and diversified portfolio of stocks that provide both a high income and a competitive risk-adjusted return versus the index. the structural risks that have built over time and accelerated in 2019.

20 Juni 2020
A photo showing Jonathan Crown
Jonathan Crown
Portfolio Manager
Share article
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Verwandte Themen
Share article
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Verwandte Themen


‘Big Tech’ dominance puts index on shifting sands

2 Facebook, Apple, Microsoft, Alphabet/Google, Amazon, Baidu, Alibaba, Tencent
3 Facebook, Apple, Microsoft, Alphabet/Google, Amazon
4 Columbia Threadneedle Investments/FactSet analysis

Wichtige informationen

Das hier zugrundeliegende Research und die Analysen sind von Columbia Threadneedle Investments für die eigenen Investmentaktivitäten erstellt worden. Aufgrund dieser sind möglicherweise bereits Entscheidungen noch vor dieser Publikation getroffen worden. Die Veröffentlichung zum jetzigen Zeitpunkt geschieht zufällig. Aus externen Quellen bezogene Informationen werden zwar als glaubwürdig angesehen, für ihren Wahrheitsgehalt und ihre Vollständigkeit kann jedoch keine Garantie übernommen werden. Alle enthaltenen Meinungsäußerungen entsprechen dem Stand zum Zeitpunkt der Veröffentlichung, können jedoch ohne Benachrichtigung geändert werden.

Verwandte Beiträge

6 Mai 2021

Paul DiGiacomo

Head of Equity Research

Covid-19 index: when might life return to ‘normal’? - May 2021

With more countries attempting to return to normality following the coronavirus pandemic, we are monitoring US economic activity as a bellweather for global recovery.
Read time - 3 min
26 April 2021

Simon Bond

Director of Responsible Investment Portfolio Management

The adapting world of ESG

Simon Bond explains the world of ESG investing, how the landscape has changed during covid-19 and how he was inspired to launch the Threadneedle (Lux) European Social Bond, a fund that seeks to do good for society as well as delivering a financial return.
Watch time - 7 min
22 April 2021

Earth Day 2021: How investors can support a greener future

To support Earth Day's theme – Restore Our Earth – some of our fund managers and analysts present their thoughts on important environmental issues from an investment perspective and look at ways to support a greener future.
Read time - 20 min

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen


Teamwork bildet eine wichtige Grundlage unseres Anlageprozesses, der so strukturiert ist, dass er die Ausarbeitung, Bewertung und Umsetzung fundierter und vielversprechender Anlageideen für unsere Portfolios erleichtert.


Columbia Threadneedle Investments bietet eine umfangreiche Palette von Investmentfonds an, die eine Vielzahl von Anlagezielen abdeckt.


Wir bieten eine breite Palette aktiv verwalteter Anlagestrategien und -lösungen, die globale, regionale und lokale Märkte und Anlageklassen abdecken.